翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ R v Nette
・ R v Noble
・ R v Nova Scotia Pharmaceutical Society
・ R v Nur
・ R v O'Connor
・ R v O'Grady
・ R v Oakes
・ R v Oickle
・ R v Coney
・ R v Constanza
・ R v Cook
・ R v Coote
・ R v Coulson, Brooks and others
・ R v Creighton
・ R v Crown Zellerbach Canada Ltd
R v Cuerrier
・ R v Cunningham
・ R v Darrach
・ R v Daviault
・ R v Davidson
・ R v Davis
・ R v DB
・ R v Dear
・ R v Department of Trade and Industry, ex parte Broadcasting, Entertainment, Cinematographic and Theatre Union
・ R v Dersch
・ R v DeSousa
・ R v District Auditor No 3 Audit District of West Yorkshire MCC, ex p West Yorkshire MCC
・ R v Dixon
・ R v Drybones
・ R v Du Plessis


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

R v Cuerrier : ウィキペディア英語版
R v Cuerrier
''R v Cuerrier'' was a 1998 decision by the Supreme Court of Canada, which ruled that knowingly exposing a sexual partner to HIV constitutes a prosecutable crime (aggravated assault) under Canadian law.
==Background==
The case involved Henry Cuerrier, a man from British Columbia who tested positive for HIV in 1992. He subsequently had sexual relationships with two women, in which he neither disclosed his HIV status nor used condoms to protect his partners. Both women later learned of Cuerrier's HIV status, and Cuerrier was subsequently charged with aggravated assault even though both women subsequently tested HIV-negative.
Under Canadian law, a charge of aggravated assault requires proof that the defendant's actions endangered the life of the complainant, and that the force must have been intentionally applied. Cuerrier, whose case was based on the fact that both women had consented to have unprotected sex with him, was acquitted in the initial court hearing. On appeal to the British Columbia Court of Appeal, the first court's ruling was upheld.

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「R v Cuerrier」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.